 |
|
|
|
 |
The Performance Institute identifies, studies and disseminates the leading management innovations pioneered by “best-in-class” organizations. A strictly non-partisan organization, The Performance Institute serves as the nation’s leading repository of thoroughly researched, documented, catalogued and peer-reviewed “best practices” in a multitude of issue areas. Below are the reports published and planned for the primary initiatives of the President's Management Agenda.
|
 |
Transitioning to Performance-based Government
Released September, 2005
In 2000, Performance Institute President Carl DeMaio formed a good government coalition to convene a series of "Transition Dialogues" on creating a management improvement agenda for the new President. The project resulted in numerous recommendations that were ultimately incorporated into the President's Management Agenda. Read the report and the associated dialogue transcripts.
|
|
|
 |
Implementing and Measuring Innovative Recruitment Strategies in Government
Released February 25, 2003
A comprehensive report cataloging various recruitment initiatives being managed by federal agencies and assessing their relative success in attracting quality employees to federal government service. The project will survey all federal agencies to identify the most innovative recruitment initiatives, examine common lessons learned, review measures of performance, and evaluate overall recruitment success.
|
|
|
 |
Managing for Results at the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency
Released September, 2005
Performance Institute President Carl DeMaio oversaw a major project looking at performance management at the U
S Environmental Protection Agency and penned this groundbreaking report on instilling a results-oriented culture at the agency.
|
| |
|
 |
Creating a Performance-Based Electronic Government
Released October 30, 2002
In May 2002, a coalition of good government groups launched a research project to identify the "best practices" in defining and measuring e-government initiatives. A research team surveyed CIOs and IT staff from every federal agency to determine how they design, plan, justify, manage, and measure the success of their e-government initiatives. This report presents the findings of that research—providing case studies from various agencies and articulating a framework for the development and use of IT performance measures.
|
| |
|
 |
Citizens' Budget 2003-2005
Released April 30, 2003
Although 45 states face budget shortfalls for the coming fiscal year, the State of California is faced with a deficit in the ballpark of $30 billion — by far the nation's largest. Working with Reason Foundation, The Performance Institute applied the methodologies and strategies it routinely uses with federal agencies and programs to the State of California's proposed FY04 budget. What we found was that governments facing budget deficits have more than two choices -- It is no longer merely an issue of raising taxes or slashing budgets across the board. Our research yielded the Citizens' Budget -- a non-partisan, 150-page plan that details a set of 10 reforms that, if implemented, would close California's $30 billion gap and actually produce a $6.5 billion surplus. The reforms recommended within the Citizens' Budget can be applied to state and local budgets nationwide.
|
| |
|
 |
San Diego Citizens' Budget Plan
Released June 21, 2004
In November, 2003, The Performance Institute launched the "San Diego Citizens' Budget Project"- an initiative that would study the city's budget with the objective of identifying cost savings and performance improvement reforms during the FY 2005 budget cycle. The San Diego Citizens’ Budget Project would provide the "local" government model for the application of performance, accountability, competition and transparency reforms. In addition to providing ideas on how the City could balance its budget in FY 2005 and beyond, the project seeks to focus the city, stakeholders, media and the general public on long-term reforms to the city's budget and management processes.
|
| |
|
 |
Stewards of a Changing Planet
Released November, 2002
In response to the call for a new strategic plan, the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA)
convened five day-and-a-half-long meetings of external stakeholders in five cities: Seattle, New Orleans, Boston,
Washington, D.C., and Boulder, Co. (there were two additional brief meetings in Cleveland and Puerto Rico). These
external stakeholders were called together to discuss and debate what they feel the role of NOAA should be and to
help brainstorm outcome goals, intermediate measures and strategies for achieving these goals. Using The
Performance Institute’s Government Performance Logic Model and through facilitation by Carl DeMaio, the
stakeholders identified an extraordinarily detailed listing of directions NOAA can follow in order to develop its new
strategic plan.
|
|
|
 |
A Collaborative Approach for Reducing Wildland Fire Risks to Communities and the Environment
10-Year Comprehensive Strategy
Released August, 2001
Over the past decade, the United States has experienced a dramatic increase in
the number of large and intensive wildland fires. As a result of the increased
number, size and intensity of wildland fires, there has been a significant increase
in the amount of money and resources spent to combat and suppress wildland
fires as well as the economic and ecological impact of such severe and largescale
damage on the communities and environments that they impact. Not
counting resources from state and local governments as well as private and nonprofit
organizations, the Federal government alone spent over $2 billion in 2000
on activities to respond to and suppress wildland fires.
|
| |
|
Transitioning to Governance
Released January 11, 2001
While interest groups inundated President Bush and senior officials with a broad range of policy recommendations, few tackled the less-glamorous topic of effective federal management. Unfortunately, many policy challenges are difficult to address without responsive, management structures to institute change, focus on performance, and coordinate competing interests. With this in mind, Carl DeMaio (then with the Reason Public Policy Institute) hosted a series of focus groups consisting of past administration officials, congressional staff, interested organizations, and other political veterans to discuss the challenges the new administration will face and offer practical advice to avoid past mistakes.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
 |